Randomized Field Trials and Internal Validity: Not So Fast My Friend. - Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation

نویسنده

  • James H. McMillan
چکیده

The purpose of this article is to summarize eight potential threats to internal validity that occur with randomized field trial (RFT) studies. Depending on specific contextual factors, RFTs do not necessarily result in strong internal validity. Of particular concern is whether the unit of random assignment is the same as the number of replications of the intervention, threats as a result of local history, and subject effects. The eight threats are described, with suggestions for providing adequate monitoring to know if they rise to the level of likely or plausible threat to internal validity.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparison of tools for assessing the methodological quality of primary and secondary studies in health technology assessment reports in Germany

UNLABELLED HEALTH CARE POLICY BACKGROUND: Findings from scientific studies form the basis for evidence-based health policy decisions. SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND Quality assessments to evaluate the credibility of study results are an essential part of health technology assessment reports and systematic reviews. Quality assessment tools (QAT) for assessing the study quality examine to what extent st...

متن کامل

Maxillary sinusitis in adults: an evaluation of placebo-controlled double-blind trials.

BACKGROUND In general practice, acute sinusitis is frequently diagnosed and treated with antibiotics. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the evidence for the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment in acute maxillary sinusitis in adults by assessing the methodological quality of placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trials. METHOD An evaluation by four raters through a 35-item scori...

متن کامل

Randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Surgical trials pose many methodological challenges often not present in trials of medical interventions. If not properly accounted for, these challenges may introduce significant biases and threaten the validity of the results. METHODS We systematically reviewed the significance of randomized controlled trials in the evaluation of surgical interventions, discussed t...

متن کامل

Randomized controlled trials for schizophrenia: study designs targeted to distinct goals.

Randomized controlled trials for antipsychotic drugs have a variety of design features suited to diverse purposes. Efficacy (or explanatory) trials seek to establish if a drug can reduce psychotic symptoms under ideal circumstances. To isolate drug effects, researchers enroll carefully selected patients. Specialized research personnel use rating scales of symptoms that are sensitive to drug eff...

متن کامل

Validity of a short functioning test (FAST) in Brazilian outpatients with bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVES As the use of functioning outcomes is increasingly being advocated in multinational clinical trials and comparative studies, making available instruments with known validity and reliability in several languages is required. Here we present data on the Portuguese validation of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST), which was explicitly designed to gauge functioning dimensions e...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007